9/11 Survivor Questions Official Story on local Fox News
On December - 8 - 2008
William Rodriguez, the “Last Man Standing” on 9/11, appeared on Fox News in Boston, MA.
He talked about explosions in the basement, before the plane hit, as well as secondary explosions occurring. Mr. Rodriguez also takes the time to mention the media blackout in the United States on 9/11 Truth issues.
Aired 5/17/07 Fox News Boston
Duration : 0:4:36
Talk soon,
Joe Beaven
P.S. To get a free report that tells you exactly how to make sure you hire the best electrician for your needs in the UK, please enter your details below:
SECURE & CONFIDENTIAL
JewFor911Truth Says:
Thousands of …
Thousands of innocent people died on 9/11 for state sponsored terrorism.
Look at the truth at
—- listep. wordpress. com —-
You will never doubt that the events of 9/11 were state sponsored after reading this. You will never doubt again what happened on that fateful day after reading this.
Real patriots question.
–”The say tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy” — James Madison
Spread the truth!
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
drryles Says:
Must see true 9-11 …
Must see true 9-11 video—see my profile and video Hidden Secrets
Dr. Ryles
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
dan917x Says:
I love how they …
I love how they have to wrap it up as soon as he starts to expose the truth. He was left out of the 9/11 commission report even though his testimony should be the most important part of the entire investigation…
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
ctcole77 Says:
Bush did it, and …
Bush did it, and here’s how it went down.
Bush was on the first plane to hit WTC and parachuted out at the last minute shouting “mission accomplished!”. If you look at the film footage you can see his parachute, it says “Don’t mess with Texas” on it.
Cheney piloted the other plane that crashed into the WTC. He died and the GOP replaced him with a robot clone. For real.
That’s why that guy got shot hunting, a Cheney-bot shot him.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
2grapes Says:
Basically
Basically
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
OZMYMAN Says:
i presume you …
i presume you believed thay found a passport?where is my passport gone its made of littuhanium hydrochbolic multicellular dispostioning atomic steel encrusted with gold? arabs are supposed to be rich but certainly not as dumb as some..now what the black box made of,oh you couldnt be asked to look for that..lol lol lol
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
shooter: (1A/3) ( …
shooter: (1A/3) (third attempt to post this response)
about “dot” com has a WTC collapse explanation that cites jet-fuel as the critical element in collapse. Just like NIST does.
Proof of major thermal event: watch?v=D9qEIlNVl5s
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
As for how the fork …
As for how the fork would handle 10,000 candles that’s a fine experiment. As with sound sources, the flames each have a power and an intensity. This is much like amperage and voltage in electricty.
Part of the fundamental here though is the fork would only be heated to the maximum of any one flame.
Nearly the exact same question: How fast could you run if you had 10,000 legs? Not much faster, maybe even slower.
With each candle depriving the others of oxy, they would each burn cooler.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
Shooter (3a/3):
…
Shooter (3a/3):
The temperature of 100 candles would depend on spacing. Inverse square law comes into effect. 3-d heat radiation is just like 3-d sound radiation. Two sidebyside 60 decibel sources have a combined value of 63 decibels. These numbers are a little deceptive because decibel scale works a little like the Richter (sp?) scale for earthquakes.
10,000 candles on a fork would be difficult. A candle occupies space that excludes another candle from occupying the same space.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
Shooter: (2/3)
…
Shooter: (2/3)
Since the base of the tower is obscured, it does become tough to calculate the precise length of time. Luckily, we can get around that by picking two points. A point “A” near the top of the tower, perhaps the base of the antenna. A point “B” about halfway down where the view of “A” passing through where “B” was is unobstructed.
time in seconds = SQRT(2*meters/9.802) is your formula for how long it takes a free-fall object to fall a given distance in New York.
Disprove freefall.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
Shooter: (1b/3)
…
Shooter: (1b/3)
How many to initiate the collapse is not the right question. A slightly better question is how many floors have to be affected by the fire, and by how much, for the tower to become the path of least resistance?
If even a small portion of the structural integrity remained the vast majority of debris should have been pushed outwards into what should have been the path of least resistance.
In a simple structure, with 50% resistance to gravity we can expect ~45 degree offset.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shooter686 Says:
A candle burns hot. …
A candle burns hot. What temp does a 100 candles burn? What about 10,000 candles? Would it be any hotter?
How would your fork handles the 10,000 candles?
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shooter686 Says:
Remain exactly …
Remain exactly where it was? Not necessarily. There was damage caused to it initially and during the collapse. There was seen.
Emotion is used when you try to claim there is a cover up or murders. I don’t use emotion, I use facts.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shooter686 Says:
When you claim the …
When you claim the “official story” claim jet fuel caused the collapse, then you are lying. Please show me where the jet fuel lasted longer than 5 minutes.
The “speed of gravity” means that you would need to have explosives on every floor. Were there? Every other floor? Every tenth floor?
So, tell me how many floors are needed to be effected by fire to initiate the collapse?
Maybe you can support your clams with an actual source.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
freein2339 Says:
911 was an inside …
911 was an inside job , anybody with common sense can see that…
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
Apologies, some …
Apologies, some poor phrasing on my part. When i said the “spire” collapses with the building, what i mean is that it does not remain standing on top of a unmolested core. The base of the antenna you refer to as the spire falls with and at the same rate as the roof of the structure.
So, by your own argument, the core must have been collapsing at the same rate as the floors. Which looking at the seismic data NIST concluded 9 seconds(11 if it was the other tower), the speed of gravity.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
Please link the …
Please link the pictures.
Actually a candle burns amazingly hot.
Steel softens progressively from 900 F to ~2500 F where it melts. 1650 F is considered the temperature required of a forge to heat steel to a workable temperature. Pressurized gas, such as from a bellows is required for this.
A candle is rated at 1400 F. It has all the characteristics of a very hot fire. No smoke, orange-yellow flame.
Try a candle on a fork. Can you soften the steel to 25% physical resistance?
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
By your very …
By your very argument:
If the core did not collpse, the spire should have remained exactly where it was. It collapses with the building. So obviously the core was collapsing at the same rate as the floors.
Use your own scientific mind and stop covering up for murderers, don’t get the blood of innocents on your hands.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
PsyberSourcerer Says:
Shooter, you’re the …
Shooter, you’re the one that suggested the entire building was reduced to 22.5%+/-2.5% of structural value.
I’m just explaining what’s required, scientifically, to make that happen by jet-fuel fire as is the offical story.
Highly redundant vertical and horizontal ENORMOUS steel supports disintegrating vertically at the speed of gravity.
How much fire do _you_ think that requires?
Isaac Newton says 4186 joules to raise 1 kg by 1 degree celcious. The formula and the numbers are verifable.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
footballaddict08 Says:
john mclaughlin (if …
john mclaughlin (if my spelling is correct)
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shooter686 Says:
Are you really …
Are you really trying to tell me that the entire building needed to melt before it could collapse?
I guess this is how you invent your own official version so that it is easier to refute it.
I see that you don’t understand scientific method. Don’t be sad, neither did Prof Jones. that is why he quit before he could be investigated for lying.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shooter686 Says:
So, why do several …
So, why do several pictures show the steel trusses sagging before the collapse?
Are you equating an office fire with a candle? Really?
I can see why you cannot relate a structure fire with anything substantial.
I tried to burn down a skyscraper with a candle, it didn’t collapse so what I saw on 9-11 didn’t happen. Am I getting your logic correct?
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shooter686 Says:
Your NIST cite was …
Your NIST cite was listing the time the debris was hitting the ground, not he collapse time. Maybe you should read it again.
Office fires have historically been over 1200C. Not surprising that your source did not know this. I wonder why????
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
shrafacz Says:
what a hero..he …
what a hero..he seems very credible what would he gain by lying?
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am
SamoanSpike07 Says:
Whats the name of …
Whats the name of the other guy survivor that nicolas cage plays.
Posted on December 8th, 2008 at 11:23 am