Taking on the Military Industrial Complex
On December - 14 - 2008
More at http://therealnews.com/c.php?c=081101YT
The Real News Network needs your support now
Duration : 0:1:58
Talk soon,
Joe Beaven
P.S. To get a free report that tells you exactly how to make sure you hire the best electrician for your needs in the UK, please enter your details below:
SECURE & CONFIDENTIAL
kingnek Says:
ron PAUL!!!!!!!!!!! …
ron PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
hivquestions Says:
this is important. …
this is important. if we do not take on the military industrial complex they will perpetrate more fraud upon the public. flu shots and even the flu itself will cause false positives on the hiv test according to a 2006 New England Journal of Medicine report. please pray for all those who have been misdiagnosed with hiv and AIDS. support the real news.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
alexglad06 Says:
I understand UL is …
I understand UL is prestigious. UL is a great thing don’t get me wrong. It’s just that in order for laboritories like UL to be trusted with their job, there’s government agencies to approve of those. It’s not quite the same as free-market being able to regulate itself. I should have been more clear in my first explanation. Then again the 500 character rule kind of makes that hard.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
alexglad06 Says:
Okay, so I guess we …
Okay, so I guess we have the similar picture in mind then, just have different wording for it. I understand that there’s many ways to look at the meaning of “de-regulation”. I too believe the government should do what you say, depending on what you mean. But I think there also has to be rules, that keep business from bribing government for example. That’s what regulation is, but at the same time, I guess you can say allowing business bribes would be regulation too, depending on how you think.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
ferrozm Says:
UL is very …
UL is very prestigious. Many retail chains won’t accept electronics if that haven’t been certified by UL. That’s how a free market could regulate itself.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
ferrozm Says:
the so called ” …
the so called “de-regulation” of the Regean years wasn’t really de-regulation at all it was more regulation to benefit the corporations. If it were real de-regulation the playing field would be even for entrepreneurs. And if govt weren’t involved at all in the markets,except to enforce contracts and deal with fraud, there would be no incentive for the corporations to send their lobbyists.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
juanmisimo Says:
Im gonna give you …
Im gonna give you an example: Evo morales video. He is a socialist, and they were praising him. They were comparing him with Obama. But you don’t know that Evo commanded an army to kill 35 civilians. You don’t know how Evo got to power, do you? He got to power by blocking streets, manipulating people, and doing riots. And I don’t understand why the this news stations portray him as a hero, or indirectly as Obama. That is just one example, and I can give you more. This channel isWithTHE left
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
macdaddi88 Says:
neo con$ = isreal …
neo con$ = isreal lobby + defense industry
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
random0815 Says:
yup, unrestricted …
yup, unrestricted free markets lead to concentration of power which is always a danger to any system, a very successful corporation can do insider trades, bribe politicians, hire economic hit men, suppress competition aso., its the fires of capitalism which have to be guarded well
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
random0815 Says:
yup, righteous king …
yup, righteous king concept, “our system is perfect if only the right people are in charge”, libertarians argue that we never had real free markets just as communists would say we never had real communism, the susceptibility of a system to corruption and misuse mustnt be excluded from the equation
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
t4705mb6 Says:
The world is run by …
The world is run by the most genocidal, greedy criminals the masses have ever known.
The people have allowed this to happen. The huge majority have “gone along”.
THEIR “laws” are tricks, written in their favor & THEIR courts are bought & paid for.
There are over 6 MILLION “laws” in the US alone.
Society MUST rewrite the laws, simplfy them, make them TRULY JUST!
Next, the people must PROSECUTE the criminals involved in the destruction of freedom.
Arrest, prosecute & isolate them!
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
alexglad06 Says:
I agree that …
I agree that manytimes government regulation does benefit big corperations, but at the same time government regulation has stopped corperations from doing bad things in the past. Part of what causes crony capitalism is deregulation, which allows businesses to bribe governments into favorable regulation. Political campaigns are so dependent on corperate dollars that politicians almost indisputably favor big business.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
alexglad06 Says:
corection, “…more …
corection, “…more successful than government agencies…”
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
alexglad06 Says:
the UL, though, …
the UL, though, doesn’t approve of anything. It’s just an independent source that surveys companies. I’m talking about organizations that are trusted to “approve” of products. The UL and similar organizations has to be approved on it’s own to ure is has proper integrity. They’re more then government agencies because the agencies are way underfunded, so much that they rely on the integrity of corperations to do their own testing and give honest results.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
alexglad06 Says:
Well, how do you …
Well, how do you expect free-markets to have the integrity to regulate themselves? If they don’t have to to do something that’s fair for everyone at the expence of their profit, how do you expect them to carry it out? I agree that we do need laws like that, but there has to be a balance of laws that keep businesses from doing criminal acts and getting away with them.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
FriedDaisy Says:
jauanmisimo: can …
jauanmisimo: can you be more specific? What other side are you talking about? Do you want positive puff pieces about Monsanto or perhaps Exxon/Mobile? Would you like to see a dramatic expose about the economic collapse which shows how CEOs are just people, too; and this crisis may mean that instead of buying a Hummer for their teen this Christmas they may have to get them a Lexus because it gets better gas mileage? Maybe a piece about how labor laws are bad for corporate profits & dividends?
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
JeffHilliard Says:
can you report on …
can you report on the people who own the federal reserve
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Rundstedt1 Says:
I dont claim that …
I dont claim that the US govt reduces force or fraud, I am a proud socialist. Remember? I shout that the libertarian system is worse! We are at opposite ends of the spectrum and can never agree on this. But I do wish you well for turkey day.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Rundstedt1 Says:
That is why …
That is why economics is not a separate field. It can not be descrided without using another field of reference, psychological behavioralism in this case.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
TabooRealities Says:
I call it what it …
I call it what it is. And if you think the US is an unregulated economy, with a government that works to reduce coercive force and fraud, your are completely asleep.
I would go to jail trying to pass my own currency… because it’s NOT A FREE MARKET. Government force punishing nonviolent choices of people.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
TabooRealities Says:
That definition is …
That definition is quoted from my economics textbook…
…your professors must have been propagandists like your self, not educators.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Rundstedt1 Says:
Two collages, three …
Two collages, three degrees, Magna Laude, current history teacher, (love teaching your children by the way) and what about you?
Even though I am in the Social Science Dept. I can’t say that even history follows purely scientific principles, for we can not recreate experiments, control groups ect… What you describe is a classical definition of psychology, not economics. Check Maslow.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Rundstedt1 Says:
(sigh)I get so …
(sigh)I get so tired this. What you have insultingly called socialism is a form of capitalism known as crony capitalism, or in essence, a form of modern economic feudalism. It has nothing to do with socialism and is really an end result of less and less regulation in capitalist system that is also advocated by your libertarian principles. Try printing your own money if you don’t like the stuff going around. Thats free market; Go for it. “Don’t take no wooden nickels.” - A free market saying
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
TabooRealities Says:
“Economics is not a …
“Economics is not a science”
lol… It’s the study of how people make choices to satisfy their needs - it is a human behavioral science, and anti-freedom propagandists’ worst nightmare.
Where did you get this “education”? A brainwashing camp?
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
ferrozm Says:
maybe but even if …
maybe but even if people were geniuses they have no right to delegate force and coercion on others through an elected leader.
Posted on December 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm